What’s New?

Public Testimony on Proposed Low-Income Housing Tax Credit Qualified Allocation Plan, PRN 2025-087

Posted on September 19, 2025

Winifred Head Shot2

Winifred Smith-Jenkins
Director of Early Learning Policy and Advocacy

To: New Jersey Housing and Mortgage Finance Agency (NJHMFA)

From: Winifred Smith-Jenkins, Ed. D, Director of Early Learning for Policy and Advocacy

Date: August 21, 2025

RE: Proposed Low-Income Housing Tax Credit Qualified Allocation Plan, PRN 2025-087

Good morning, Chair and members of the New Jersey Housing and Mortgage Finance Agency. My name is Winifred Smith-Jenkins, and I serve as the Director of Early Childhood Policy and Advocacy at Advocates for Children of New Jersey. Our statewide nonprofit has spent more than 45 years working to make New Jersey a better place to grow up. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the proposed Qualified Allocation Plan. I am here to talk about why housing policy and child care policy must be part of the same conversation — and why the decisions you make today can transform outcomes for children, parents, and entire communities.

In New Jersey, child care refers to the care and supervision of children from birth through age 13. Just as you cannot leave a 4-month-old infant at home alone, you also cannot leave a 7-year-old unattended. Children of all ages need safe, reliable environments that not only protect their well-being but also stimulate their minds and support their growth. High-quality child care provides exactly that — giving parents the peace of mind to pursue their personal and professional goals, while ensuring children are nurtured, engaged, and prepared to thrive.

Child care is not just babysitting. It is the daily work of caring for and educating young children in settings that meet state safety and quality standards, so parents can work, attend school, or train for better jobs. In New Jersey, there are two primary types: home-based care, provided by registered family child care providers serving three to five children, and center-based care, licensed programs serving six or more children in purpose-built facilities with trained staff. High-quality child care is where early brain development meets workforce stability — it is essential infrastructure for a modern economy.

The benefits are profound. Decades of research show that high-quality child care builds strong foundations for learning, social-emotional growth, and healthy development. It closes achievement gaps before they start, particularly for children from low-income households, and it pays for itself many times over. Nobel laureate economist James Heckman’s research shows a 13% annual return on investment through better education outcomes, higher earnings, and reduced costs in social services, healthcare, and the justice system. For parents, access to reliable child care is the difference between holding a steady job and cycling in and out of work. For employers, it means a dependable workforce. For communities, it is a pathway out of poverty that benefits generations.

And yet, despite its importance, New Jersey’s child care system is in crisis. We lack licensed capacity for 73% of infants and toddlers likely to need care. Forty percent of our municipalities are child care deserts. Infant care costs more than $21,000 a year — higher than tuition at many of our public colleges. This is not just a shortage; it is a market failure. It costs providers more to deliver quality care — because of low child-to-staff ratios, strict safety requirements, and the need for skilled educators — than families can afford to pay. This is where housing policy can be part of the solution. The best place for child care is close to the families it serves. When we embed child care in or near affordable housing, we remove a major barrier for parents who no longer have to juggle long commutes or multiple drop-offs. We expand the supply by creating purpose-built space in new developments. We create local jobs — child care centers employ teachers, aides, cooks, and administrators, many of whom may live in the very housing where the center is located. And we stabilize communities — children get quality early learning, parents keep steady jobs, and dollars circulate locally.

Other states have recognized this. California and the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco award competitive points for projects with on-site licensed child care. These incentives don’t just create convenience — they expand the actual number of child care slots. Here in New Jersey, the current Qualified Allocation Plan acknowledges the importance of proximity to child care, awarding points for projects near licensed centers or for offering social services that could include child care. But as written, these provisions only increase competition for a limited supply; they do not create new capacity.

We can do better. I urge NJHMFA to adopt two targeted changes that will have lasting impact:

  1. Award three points for family-cycle developments that provide finished, licensable ground-floor space for child care — with capacity for at least two children per ten housing units, plus dedicated outdoor play space — leased at nominal cost to licensed providers.
  2. Require all new two- and three-bedroom units to meet the modest additional requirements for registered family child care. This would allow residents to become licensed providers, building both capacity and income within the community.

Consider this: A mother in Burlington is raising two young children — a 6-month-old and a 2-year-old — on her own. After years of striving, she’s offered a full-time job with benefits, the kind of opportunity that could change everything. But instead of relief, she feels panic. There is no affordable child care nearby. Taking the job would mean cobbling together unreliable care arrangements with neighbors or relatives. Faced with that choice, she is ready to turn down the very opportunity she has been working toward.

Now imagine that same mother just a few months later. A new affordable housing development opens in her neighborhood — and inside that very building is a high-quality child care center. Throughout the development, registered family child care providers operate from their homes. Suddenly, everything changes. She can walk her children just steps from her apartment to safe, nurturing care. She takes the job, moves off public assistance, and begins building a career. Her children are thriving, and the cycle of opportunity has begun.

This does not have to be a fantasy. This is what happens when we connect the dots between housing and child care. We don’t just provide families with shelter — we give them stability, support, and opportunities to build a better life. We don’t just change addresses; we change futures.

That is why I urge you to strengthen the Qualified Allocation Plan by making child care part of the housing conversation and the housing solution. I also welcome the opportunity to work with NJHMFA staff to support the integration of child care into new tax-credit financed housing developments.

Housing is the foundation for stability. Child care is the bridge to opportunity. Together, they give families the security and tools to thrive. You have the power to ensure that when we build affordable housing in New Jersey, we are not just giving families a roof over their heads — we are giving them the supports they need to work, to learn, and to raise children who will succeed in school and in life.

Thank you for your time and for your leadership on behalf of New Jersey’s families.

ACNJ Testimony to Senate Education Committee on Bill S4476

Posted on June 23, 2025

Winifred Head Shot2

Winifred Smith-Jenkins
Director of Early Learning Policy and Advocacy

Bill S4476 permits awarding of contracts for certain preschool education services by resolution of board of education; extends maximum length of preschool education services contracts to three years. Identical Bill Number: A5780

To: Senate Education Committee

From: Advocates for Children of New Jersey (ACNJ)

Date: May 12, 2025

RE: ACNJ’s Testimony on S4476

Dear Chairman Gopal and Members of the Senate Education Committee:

My name is Winifred Smith-Jenkins, and I serve as the Director of Early Childhood Policy and Advocacy at Advocates for Children of New Jersey. Thank you for the opportunity to testify in strong support of Senate Bill 4476.

This bill is a critical next step. It removes a significant bureaucratic barrier that hinders the expansion of high-quality preschool in New Jersey. ACNJ has long supported a mixed delivery system—one that includes community-based providers as essential partners in delivering early childhood education. S4476 helps advance that goal by simplifying the contracting process and extending contract terms to three years.

Importantly, multi-year contracts give providers something they’ve long needed—stability. When a provider has a contract that goes beyond a single year, it becomes a tool they can take to the bank to secure a loan, make much-needed infrastructure upgrades, purchase furnishings, and invest in high-quality classroom materials. It helps them manage the shortfalls that often come in June, when only a partial payment might arrive, but all their bills—staff salaries, rent, utilities—are still due.

This bill provides assurances that were once missing. It brings peace of mind, helping providers plan and grow confidently, knowing the partnership with their local school district isn’t just a one-year experiment, but a long-term commitment to our youngest learners.

We urge your support for S4476. Let’s give providers the foundation they need to deliver strong, stable preschool programs for New Jersey’s children.

Thank you.

Trashaun’s Preeclampsia Story: From Trauma to Empowerment and Purpose

Posted on May 27, 2025

Maternal health advocate and preeclampsia survivor Trashaun has turned her trauma into empowerment and purpose, sharing her story and advocating for increased awareness and support for expectant parents.

Preeclampsia is a serious pregnancy complication that affects thousands of women every year. It can lead to high blood pressure, organ damage, seizures, and even death if not caught early. But here’s the surprising part: the way we diagnose preeclampsia hasn’t changed much in over 100 years.

Trashaun Powell, Somerset County Mom, Maternal Health Advocate, and Preeclampsia Survivor

Right now, doctors mostly rely on checking a pregnant woman’s blood pressure and looking for protein in her urine. These methods aren’t always reliable. That means some women don’t get the help they need in time, while others may end up being treated for something they don’t actually have.

The Promise of Biomarkers

That’s where something called biomarkers comes in. Biomarkers are signals in your body—things found in your blood, urine, or saliva—that can tell doctors when something’s wrong. For preeclampsia, certain biomarkers could help spot the condition before it becomes dangerous.

Using biomarkers would allow doctors to:

  • Catch preeclampsia earlier
  • Know how serious it is
  • Avoid unnecessary hospital visits
  • Keep moms and babies safer

Researchers have already found some promising biomarkers, but these tests aren’t widely used yet. That needs to change—and fast.

A Call to Action

The Preeclampsia Foundation is urging everyone—doctors, researchers, hospitals, insurance companies, and government leaders—to make biomarker testing a priority. They want:

  • More research funding
  • Faster approval of new tests
  • Better access for all pregnant women, especially those most at risk
  • This is especially important for Black and Native American women, who are more likely to get preeclampsia and suffer worse outcomes.

What You Can Do

We have the tools to save lives—we just need to use them. If you’re pregnant, planning to be, or know someone who is, talk to your doctor about preeclampsia and the latest in testing. And consider supporting the work of the Preeclampsia Foundation, which is fighting for better care for all moms and babies.

🔗 Learn more and join the movement at preeclampsia.org.

2025 election badge2

Let's make children and their
families the center of the
2025 Election Campaign.

For more information on this topic, contact Winifred at wsmith-jenkins@acnj.org.

U.S. House of Representatives Moved the Federal Budget Process Forward

Posted on July 1, 2025

Last Thursday, the U.S. House of Representatives passed the “One Big Beautiful Bill Act” along party lines 215 (R)/214 (D).  The bill now moves to the U.S. Senate for their consideration. If H.R. 1 becomes law, several provisions of the bill will have a serious and devastating impact on NJ FamilyCare (which is funded by Medicaid) and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or SNAP. Below are highlights. There are also provisions related to tax credits and student loans, which will impact children, youth, and families. We will update the ACNJ website as we learn more, so continue to check in.

Medicaid Related Sections

Almost 20% of New Jersey residents have health insurance coverage through NJ FamilyCare, which is funded by federal and state Medicaid dollars, as well as the federal Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP). This includes over 860,000 children. H.R. 1 will “save” nearly $700 billion in spending over the next 10 years by imposing additional eligibility requirements or restricting eligibility, thus reducing the number of people being covered by state public health insurance programs like NJ FamilyCare. H.R. 1 includes the following provisions:

  • Impose 80 hours of work or community engagement activities, such as education or volunteer service, for individuals ages 19 to 64 applying for coverage or enrolled through the Affordable Care Act expansion group, no later than December 31, 2026. This population is commonly referred to as the Medicaid expansion population. ACNJ was pleased to see an exemption in the bill for pregnant women, individuals under the age of 19 or over the age of 64, foster youth and former foster youth under the age of 26, members of tribes, and individuals who are considered “medically frail.” Individuals will have to verify that they are exempt.
  • Reduce retroactive coverage for Medicaid and Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) to one month from three months as of December 31, 2026.
  • Require redetermination of eligibility every six months for the Medicaid expansion populations to begin on December 31, 2026.
  • Freeze current amount of provider taxes for states.
  • Require states to impose co-pays for Medicaid expansion adults with incomes over 100% of the federal poverty level (FPL). This cost-sharing may not exceed $35 per service. Exempted services include: primary care services, mental health care services, or substance use disorder services.
  • Impose new penalties for states that provide healthcare to undocumented immigrants. H.R. 1 would reduce the federal Medicaid expansion match rate from 90% to 80% for states like New Jersey that use state funds to provide health coverage for children, regardless of their immigration status, or pregnant adults covered under the Medicaid option for these groups.

Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) Related Sections 

Close to 360,000 New Jersey children participate in SNAP currently. The House Resolution will reduce spending on SNAP by approximately $267 billion over the next ten years by restricting eligibility and shifting a greater percentage of the cost for both the benefit and administration of SNAP to the states.

Currently, the actual SNAP benefit is paid with federal dollars. H.R. 1 shifts 5% of the benefit and an additional 25% of the administrative costs to the states. According to the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, if every state paid 5% of food benefit costs last year, states would have needed to collectively pay about $4.7 billion. The New Jersey Department of Human Services estimates that the additional 25% of administrative costs being shifted to the states will cost New Jersey counties an additional $78 million. Following are SNAP related provisions:

  • Limit the frequency of updates to the Thrifty Food Plan (TFP)—the basis for calculating SNAP benefits—to once every five years, requiring cost neutrality in updates.
  • Expand work required for able-bodied adults without dependents, raising the age from 54 to 64, and narrow the definition of a dependent child to those under the age of 7, limiting caregiving exemptions.
  • Restrict the automatic qualification for utility deductions in SNAP calculations to households with elderly or disabled members and limit income exclusions for state energy assistance.
  • Require states to contribute at least 5% toward SNAP benefit costs starting in FY 2028, with higher contributions (up to 25%) required for states with high SNAP error rates. Currently, the federal government pays 100% of the SNAP benefit.
  • Increase in the state’s share of administrative costs for implementing SNAP to 75%.

Ways and Means Bill Sections 

  • For the Child Tax Credit
    • Temporarily increase the Child Tax Credit to $2500 until 2028 and then return to $2000.
    • Set the refundable portion of the credit to $1400.
    • Require that individuals have earned income to be eligible for the credit.
    • Require a social security number for children, tax filers, and the tax filer’s spouse if married.
  • Temporarily boost the standard deduction — a $1,000 increase for individuals, bringing it to $16,000 for individual filers, and a $2,000 boost for joint filers, bringing it to $32,000. The deduction reduces the amount of income that is actually subject to income tax.
  • Increase the State and Local Tax (SALT) cap to $40,000 for incomes up to $500,000, with the cap phasing downward for those with higher incomes. Also, the cap and income threshold will increase 1% annually over 10 years.
  • Create a tax credit for school vouchers.
  • Parents or guardians who open new “Trump” accounts for their children will receive $1,000 from the federal government for babies born between Jan. 1, 2024 and Dec. 31, 2028. Families could add $5,000 a year, however, funds cannot be withdrawn before age 18, at which time they could access up to 50% of the money to pay for higher education, training, and first-time home purchases. At age 30, account holders have access to the full balance of the account for any purpose.

Pell Related Sections

  • Eliminate Pell Grant eligibility for less-than-half-time students.
  • Raise the definition of “full-time” to 15 credits per semester to get full Pell (from the current 12 credits).
  • Eliminate Stafford subsidized loans.
  • Eliminate graduate student PLUS loans and limit parent PLUS loans.
  • Eliminate existing income-contingent repayment plans and create a single income-based repayment plan, increasing the percentage of discretionary income and the number of payments needed before a loan can be forgiven.
  • Prevent the Department of Education from promulgating regulations that increase loan subsidy costs or are economically significant (no new debt relief regulations).
  • Clarify that payments made by new borrowers on or after July 1, 2025, who are serving in a medical or dental residency, do not count as a qualifying payment for purposes of the Public Service Loan Forgiveness Program.
  • Cap federal loans at the median cost of the student’s program of study.