What’s New?

Share with Legislators ACNJ president’s Op-ed supporting legislative bills to invest in child care.

Posted on April 21, 2022

It's time to address the long-time child care crisis in New Jersey.  The pandemic didn’t create it – it exposed it.

Let's urge legislators to support Senate Majority Leader Teresa Ruiz's comprehensive package of bills that would help parents, strengthen programs and support staff. One bill, S-2476 (pending introduction), incentivizes the development of child care for infants and toddlers, the most difficult for families to find.

Share the op-ed authored by ACNJ President Cecilia Zalkind describing this historic proposal.

The package comes with a $360 million price tag. But we need to tell state leaders that this is an investment we cannot afford not to make.

Read the Op-Ed

New Jersey's commitment to children has led to extraordinary advances, putting the state ahead of the rest of the country and most importantly, improving the lives and well-being of newborns and preschool-age children.

But we are still missing the babies.

Let's make some noise for child care  and take a moment to send a message to your state leaders that this is a critical investment for children, families and for our economy.

During this legislative session, ACNJ is calling on the state to:

  • Improve access to infant/toddler care by increasing the number of available child care programs;
  • Expand child care assistance for parents of very young children; and
  • Support the child care workforce, who have historically been underfunded and underappreciated
reimagine-child-care

Unlocking Potential: Our Ambitious Roadmap to Close Inequities for NJ Babies

Posted on June 24, 2020

In order to give all children a strong and equitable start in life, New Jersey must begin with an intentional focus on eliminating racial inequities and disparities in access to essential supports, according to a new report, Unlocking Potential, released today by Advocates for Children of New Jersey (ACNJ).

Read Unlocking Potential, A Roadmap to Making New Jersey the Safest, Healthiest and Most Supportive Place to Give Birth and Raise a Family

The statewide plan, funded by the Pritzker Children's Initiative (PCI), provides the action steps needed to achieve concrete targets related to early childhood development with the goal of ensuring an additional 25 percent of low-income infants and toddlers - 27,000 young children - will have access to high-quality services by 2023. These supports include access to quality child care, home visiting, health and mental health services.

Unlocking Potential is based on the belief that we all have a role to play in achieving equity and that supporting equal opportunities at the start of a child’s life is the first step in eliminating disparities that impact outcomes for babies, families and communities. The foundation for change is in place; the opportunity is now!

 

Counting Everyone: Why the Proposed 2030 Census Rules Matter

Posted on October 22, 2026

Have you ever wondered how governments plan for their communities? How do local governments plan for residents' needs, from determining where new hospitals are needed and which roads need repairs to ensuring there are enough emergency services? How do policymakers decide how much funding to allocate for schools and other public services needed?

The decennial census is a key part of the answer.

The first decennial census took place in 1790 and consisted of six questions. Its primary purpose was to get a population count to determine how many seats in the U.S House of Representatives would be apportioned among the states, also known as an apportionment count. Since then, the census has been conducted every 10 years and has become an important source of data for many other purposes.

On September 10, 2026, the Census Bureau proposed changes to the rules in the upcoming 2030 Decennial Census. These changes could affect how people are counted, how states are represented, and what demographic data are collected. 

1. Many residents would no longer count

The rule proposes that citizens of foreign countries who are also “either citizens or lawful permanent residents of the United States” would be included in the apportionment count, but all other citizens of foreign countries would not. This proposed rule would, for the first time, exclude many residents such as  work visa holders, international students, refugees, and more from the apportionment count. If this rule were to pass, then we could have less accurate population data which could have many impacts such as difficulty planning public services and effects on federal funding.

2. Many people may be counted in the wrong place

This would be a result of the Census Bureau proposal “to define the relevant ‘census enumeration period’ to run from January 3 to April 1 during decennial census years.” This means that if a person lives in New Jersey for most of the year, but during the enumeration period they are living in another state, whether it is for work or leisure, they would be counted as living in that state.

3. No race or ethnicity questions

This rule proposes to exclude race and ethnicity questions from the “decennial census short-form questionnaire or any questionnaire used for the enumeration of the population.” The removal of this data could affect other surveys in the United States, as decennial census counts serve as the basis for other surveys. Consequently, this exclusion could result in the loss of reliable race and ethnicity data at federal, state, and local levels. Race and ethnicity data are crucial for many purposes, including tracking changes in disparities, assessing public health outcomes, and informing policy decisions.

These are just some of the potential implications of the proposed changes.

 

Want to learn more or share your thoughts?

You can review the proposed rule and submit a public comment by November 2, 2026. Visit https://www.regulations.gov/docket/USBC-2026-0628.

Public comments can help inform the Census Bureau’s decision-making process.

Want to learn more or share
your thoughts?
Review the proposed rule and submit a public comment by
November 2, 2026. 

Need help drafting your comment? Visit:

It Starts With an Idea: How a Bill Becomes Law in New Jersey

Posted on October 1, 2026

Shaylynn-web-3

By Shaylynn Bivens, J.D.
Senior Legislative Analyst

 

If you have ever followed a bill in New Jersey, you know the legislative process can feel complicated. A bill can be introduced, referred to committee, amended, held for months, voted on, sent to the other house, amended again, and eventually reach the Governor’s desk. Sometimes legislation moves quickly. Other times, it can take years.

For advocates, providers, families, and community members, understanding that process matters. Knowing where a bill is can help you understand what has happened, what still needs to happen, and when your voice can make a difference.

As a Senior Legislative Analyst, I spend a significant amount of time tracking legislation, reviewing amendments, monitoring committee activity, and communicating with policymakers and advocates. Here is a quick look at how an idea becomes law in New Jersey and how you can follow that process yourself.

It starts with an idea

Every bill begins with a problem, policy goal, or idea for changing existing law. That idea can come from a legislator, constituent, advocacy organization, state agency, professional association, or other stakeholder.

Once a legislator decides to pursue the idea, the Office of Legislative Services can assist with drafting. The proposal can then be introduced in either the Senate or General Assembly.

Introduction is only the beginning

After introduction, a bill receives a number and is generally referred to a standing committee. This is where much of the substantive work begins.

Committees can hear testimony, ask questions, consider amendments, and vote on whether to advance legislation. Committee chairs play an important role in determining when, or whether, a bill is considered.

Committee meetings are also an important opportunity for public engagement. Advocates, experts, organizations, and members of the public can provide testimony and communicate directly with legislators.

Follow the language, not just the bill number

A bill number can stay the same while the substance of a bill changes. Legislation can be amended in committee or on the floor, and the version that ultimately moves forward may look very different from the version originally introduced.

That is especially important when legislation affects children and families. Even a small change in statutory language can affect funding, eligibility, implementation, or who ultimately benefits from a policy.

When tracking a bill, read the actual bill text, check for amendments or substitutes, and review the legislative history. Always look at the most recent version.

From one house to the other

If a committee advances a bill, it can move to the full Senate or General Assembly for consideration. A bill generally needs 21 votes in the Senate or 41 votes in the General Assembly to pass.

Passage in one house is not the finish line. The bill then goes through the legislative process in the other house. Both houses must ultimately approve identical language before the bill can be presented to the Governor.

Once both houses pass the same version, the Governor can sign the bill into law or veto it, among other actions authorized by the New Jersey Constitution.

A law still has to work

A Governor’s signature is not the end of the policy process. Once a law takes effect, state agencies and other entities may need to develop regulations, guidance, programs, applications, or reporting requirements.

For advocates, engagement does not end when a bill is signed. Implementation can determine how a law actually works for the people it was intended to serve.

How to find and research a bill

The New Jersey Legislature’s website, NJLeg.gov, is an important tool for anyone who wants to follow state legislation.

If you know the bill number, you can search for it directly, such as A123 or S123. If you do not know the number, the Bill Search feature allows you to search by subject, sponsor, keyword, date of action, current status, or final action. The Advanced Search feature provides additional ways to narrow your search.

Once you find a bill, click on the bill number to review its sponsors, synopsis, bill text, legislative history, status, and voting information.

When researching a bill, look at:

  • Sponsors: Who introduced the bill and who has joined as a sponsor?
  • Synopsis: What does the bill propose to do? Use this as a starting point, not a substitute for the actual bill text.
  • Bill text: What would the legislation actually change? Check for reprints, amendments, or substitutes.
  • Legislative history: What actions has the bill taken and when?
  • Current status: Where is the bill in the process?
  • Votes: How did legislators vote?
  • Fiscal information: Is there information about the potential cost or fiscal impact?

The Legislature also provides information about Senate, Assembly, joint, and other committees. Committee pages include members, schedules, committee aides, voting records, and bills before the committee.

If you are tracking a particular bill, knowing its committee assignment can tell you what to watch next. You can check the committee’s schedule to see whether the bill has been placed on an upcoming agenda. The Legislative Calendar is another useful resource for tracking upcoming sessions, committee meetings, and public hearings.

You can also use the Legislature’s Bill Subscription Service to monitor bills and receive updates when legislative action occurs or when a bill is scheduled for consideration.

Where your voice fits

There is no single moment when advocacy matters. There are opportunities to engage when an idea is being developed, during committee consideration, before floor votes, when amendments are being negotiated, during the budget process, and after legislation becomes law.

That can mean providing testimony, sharing research and data, elevating community experiences, identifying unintended consequences, suggesting amendments, building coalitions, or monitoring implementation.

For organizations like Advocates for Children of New Jersey, legislative analysis is not simply about knowing whether a bill passed or failed. It is about understanding what the legislation actually does, who it affects, what resources are required, and what implementation will look like in practice.

It is about more than votes

At its core, the legislative process is how New Jersey turns ideas into state law. But it is also about deliberation, negotiation, public input, and accountability.

A bill may start with one idea, but getting it across the finish line requires navigating committees, amendments, negotiations, votes, the Governor, and ultimately implementation.

Understanding that process also means knowing how to follow it. The next time you hear about a bill, go to NJLeg.gov, find the bill, read the language, review its history, check its status and committee assignment, and see what happens next.

Understanding how the process works is one of the first steps toward making your voice heard in Trenton.

ACNJ Statement on Passage of NJ Assembly Bill 5107 (A5107)

Posted on September 30, 2026

Advocates for Children of New Jersey applauds the General Assembly’s passage of A5107, sponsored by Assemblywoman Shanique Speight, which would require New Jersey's Department of Human Services to conduct review of reimbursement rates paid by the state's child care assistance program to certain child care providers.

Access to child care that meets the realities of working families is essential to a strong early care and education system. As families’ work schedules vary, providers need the resources to offer care when it is needed. Examining reimbursement rates is an important step toward understanding how New Jersey can better support providers and expand access to care for families.

For families with work schedules that vary from week to week or fall outside standard child care hours, having access to care that fits their schedules can be critical to maintaining employment and economic stability. At the same time, providers must have the resources to sustain these services and meet the needs of the children and families they serve.

Understanding whether current reimbursement rates adequately reflect the costs of providing care during non-traditional hours can help identify opportunities to strengthen the child care system. ACNJ appreciates Assemblywoman Speight’s continued leadership on child care and her efforts to advance policies that support providers and the families who rely on them.

Head Start Is Too Important to Weaken: What the Proposed Changes Could Cost New Jersey

Posted on September 22, 2026

cindy shields
Cindy Shields
Senior Policy Analyst for Early Childhood Education

The Proposed Changes Could Destabilize New Jersey’s Child Care Ecosystem

Head Start is part of New Jersey’s broader early childhood system, working alongside child care centers, family child care providers, school districts, health care providers, social-service organizations, and state-funded preschool programs. Weakening Head Start would place additional pressure on every part of this interconnected system.

The proposal would eliminate several qualification requirements for program directors, fiscal officers, family-service professionals, home visitors, and health and disability managers. It would remove certain training and coaching requirements for education staff.

New Jersey already faces a serious early childhood workforce shortage. Lowering qualifications or reducing staff will not solve that crisis. It risks increasing workloads, accelerating burnout and turnover, and weakening the career pathways needed to recruit and retain skilled educators.

Head Start in New Jersey:
What It Is and Why It Matters

Head Start employs more than 4,300 early childhood professionals in New Jersey. If programs are expected to save money by reducing staffing, those job losses could place additional pressure on the rest of the child care sector. Programs already struggling to find qualified teachers could face even greater competition, disruption, and instability.

The proposal would also reduce the allowable cap for administrative costs from 15% to 5%. Administration is not simply paperwork. It includes fiscal management, human resources, technology, data systems, insurance, compliance, and the human infrastructure needed to run a comprehensive program.

Programs cannot absorb a reduction of this size without difficult choices. Cuts could affect staff positions, employee benefits, family services, vendor contracts, professional development, program hours, or classroom quality. Each reduction would affect another part of the early childhood ecosystem.

Families Could Lose Essential Health and Developmental Supports

The proposal would remove detailed requirements governing health, dental, vision, and developmental screenings; follow-up care; referrals; family partnerships; and coordination with medical providers.

Delayed screenings can allow manageable concerns to become more serious and costly. Early identification gives children the best opportunity to benefit from intervention while reducing future pressure on families, schools, and health systems.

Reducing these screenings and services could delay identifying children’s needs, leaving families without timely support and requiring schools to provide more intensive—and potentially more costly—interventions later.

Head Start Is Too Big to Fail

Saying that Head Start is “too big to fail” is not simply about the size of the program. It is about the breadth of its impact and the number of systems that are connected to it.

Head Start helps young children learn to communicate, regulate their emotions, cooperate with others, solve problems, make choices, and become more independent. These are the foundational skills children carry into kindergarten, later education, employment, and adulthood.

If Head Start is weakened:

  • Children could receive less individual attention and fewer comprehensive services.
  • Dual-language learners could lose culturally and linguistically responsive instruction.
  • Parents could face new barriers to employment, education, and job training.
  • Early childhood educators and family-support professionals could lose jobs.
  • Local vendors and service providers could lose business.
  • Child care programs could face additional demand they lack the capacity or funding to meet.
  • Schools and health systems could inherit greater unmet developmental, behavioral, and medical needs.
  • Families could lose trusted partners who help them navigate complex systems.

No single program could easily replace everything Head Start provides. Child care alone would not replace its health, nutrition, disability, and family services. Schools could not fully replace its support for infants, toddlers, pregnant women, and working families. Community organizations could not absorb its statewide reach without significant new resources.

Weakening Head Start would not reduce costs. It would shift those costs and responsibilities to families, employers, child care providers, school districts, health systems, community organizations, small businesses, and other parts of our state.

PROTECT HEAD START

Submit your comments by October 6.

Head Start can evolve, and unnecessary administrative burdens should be addressed. But modernization should strengthen its comprehensive model—not dismantle the standards that make it effective.

Head Start is part of New Jersey’s educational foundation, child care ecosystem, workforce infrastructure, health and human-services network, and local economy. It is too important to weaken, too interconnected to dismantle, and too valuable to fail.